By: Tim DelChiaro
Abstract: My next top C++11 feature is actually a feature discontinuation
This is a repost of a blog post from Embarcadero's John Thomas. You can get to his blog and the original post by clicking the blog post name below.
My next top C++11 feature is actually a feature discontinuation. Many of you C++ programmers may not be aware of the ‘export’ keyword that was introduced in C++98 because very few compilers supported it (Borland and Comeu are the only ones I of which I am aware when using the EDG front-end). The purpose of this keyword was to allow a C++ developer to write a template declaration in a standard header file but be able to put the implementation in a source file. Sounds like a good idea for may reasons, right? As it turns out, it wasn’t a highly desired feature by most C++ developers.
And, to some extent, this feature was a compiler vendor’s white whale. One could not consider themselves 100% compliant to the spec without it, but truth be known, it was really hard to implement and wreaked havoc on the link stage.
One of the keys I have learned to being a good product manager is not only knowing what features to add to a release but also know what feature to ‘not’ add. So, kudos to the C++ standards committee for recognizing this as an undesired feature and officially removing the feature from the C++11 specification.
Could not retrieve comments. Please try again later.
Free 30-day trial! Develop for Windows, Mac, Android, iOS, devices and gadgets!
More social media choices:
C++Builder on Google+
@RADtools on Twitter
Server Response from: ETNASC04