﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <description><![CDATA[Comments for Using a .NET Assembly via COM by Jim McKeeth]]></description>
    <title><![CDATA[Comments for Using a .NET Assembly via COM by Jim McKeeth]]></title>
    <link>http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/32754</link>
    <!-- source: http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/32754/feed-->
    <dc:date>2013-05-18T16:41:35-07:00</dc:date>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[How would you like to see CCW/RCW covered?]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[re: Using a .NET Assembly via COM by Jim McKeeth]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Jim McKeeth)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.embarcadero.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38316</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-11-11T11:00:48-08:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2009-11-11T11:00:48-08:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/32754/feed">Comments for Using a .NET Assembly via COM by Jim McKeeth</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[That being the case, I would have to agree that it must be a compliment.  Since there are so many differnt bad ways to solve a problem and very few good ways, when you find two people who converge, statistically it suggests they both found the good way.]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[re: Exactly like the MSDN tour 2 years ago...]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (C Johnson)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.embarcadero.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38486</guid>
      <dc:date>2005-06-06T09:48:02-07:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2005-06-06T09:48:02-07:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/32754/feed">Comments for Using a .NET Assembly via COM by Jim McKeeth</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[That is surprising it is such a match since this article was completely written from scratch.  I missed that MSDN tour so I puzzeled this out on my own since I couldn't find and definitive instructions.  Since I had trouble finding instructions I thought others might be having trouble too, thus the reason I wrote this.So I guess I will take your comments that this is layed out like the MSDN tour as a compliment.  Thanks!]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[re: Exactly like the MSDN tour 2 years ago...]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Jim McKeeth)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.embarcadero.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38315</guid>
      <dc:date>2005-03-30T08:19:47-07:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2005-03-30T08:19:47-07:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/32754/feed">Comments for Using a .NET Assembly via COM by Jim McKeeth</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[I think this subject needs in CCW/RCW explanation.]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[Using a .NET Assembly via COM by Jim McKeeth]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Vladimir Afanasyev)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.embarcadero.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38314</guid>
      <dc:date>2005-03-30T00:11:37-07:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2005-03-30T00:11:37-07:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/32754/feed">Comments for Using a .NET Assembly via COM by Jim McKeeth</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[useful then, useful now, but damned if it doesn't layout EXACTLY like the free MSDN tour event put on in Canada about 2 years ago.I could hold up presentation notes (if I took any), and they would match point for point, pretty much in the same order.Although, to be honest, the MSDN presentation was better because it was in person and you could follow along watching it work.  I could probably dig up a MS Webcast that's pretty much identical too, again free, and again better because of the visual see it work component.Borland : Ya know, teaching is good, but hey, if you wanna represent MS events, why not just track down the MS Webcasts and link to 'em??  The Borland site should focus on borland stuff when you wanna go into detail.To everyone else, MSDN events can be your best friend, even if you don't use Visual Studio, so definitely keep an eye out for 'em (hey, free training NEVER goes wrong).  Check out your msdn flash newsletter for dates of tours.Regardless, like I say, it's all good information, albeit old, so I gave it a 4.]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[Exactly like the MSDN tour 2 years ago...]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (C Johnson)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.embarcadero.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38313</guid>
      <dc:date>2005-03-29T23:35:06-07:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2005-03-29T23:35:06-07:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/32754/feed">Comments for Using a .NET Assembly via COM by Jim McKeeth</source>
    </item>
    <generator>Atom 1.0 XSLT Transform v1 (http://atom.geekhood.net)</generator>
  </channel>
</rss>