﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <description><![CDATA[Comments for Borland Conference 2004 Blogs]]></description>
    <title><![CDATA[Comments for Borland Conference 2004 Blogs]]></title>
    <link>http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/32752</link>
    <!-- source: http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/32752/feed-->
    <dc:date>2009-07-06T17:01:39-07:00</dc:date>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[What I have read sounds very impressive however, why the hell do we need C# in Delphi? What does it have to do with Delphi? There already are C# Builder and Visul C# IDE's for this language. I could use EditPlus 2 which is a general purpose programming languages IDE to write C# code. Delphi is just about itself as it has always used to be. Why not add B, C, C++, D, Java, Perl, COBOL, VB, etc. support to future Delphi versions? It is enough to have both, Delphi for Win32 and Delphi for .NET in the Delphi IDE since the two appraches revolve around the Object Pascal language. I do not understand this decision to add C# in Delphi. ]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[Borland Conference 2004 Blogs]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Cristian Anton)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.embarcadero.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=37724</guid>
      <dc:date>2004-10-22T13:17:26-07:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2004-10-22T13:17:26-07:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/32752/feed">Comments for Borland Conference 2004 Blogs</source>
    </item>
    <generator>Atom 1.0 XSLT Transform v1 (http://atom.geekhood.net)</generator>
  </channel>
</rss>