<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Comments for Borland Conference 2004 Blogs</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/plain" href="http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/32752" title="Borland Conference 2004 Blogs" />
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/32752/feed" title="Comments for Borland Conference 2004 Blogs" />
<id>http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/32752</id>
<updated>2009-11-07T22:14:34-08:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>Borland Conference 2004 Blogs</title>
<author>
<name>Cristian Anton</name>
<uri>http://threads.embarcadero.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=37724</uri>
</author>
<id>http://threads.embarcadero.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=37724</id>
<updated>2004-10-22T13:17:26-07:00</updated>
<published>2004-10-22T13:17:26-07:00</published>
<summary>Borland Conference 2004 Blogs</summary>
<content>What I have read sounds very impressive however, why the hell do we need C# in Delphi? What does it have to do with Delphi? There already are C# Builder and Visul C# IDE's for this language. I could use EditPlus 2 which is a general purpose programming languages IDE to write C# code. Delphi is just about itself as it has always used to be. Why not add B, C, C++, D, Java, Perl, COBOL, VB, etc. support to future Delphi versions? It is enough to have both, Delphi for Win32 and Delphi for .NET in the Delphi IDE since the two appraches revolve around the Object Pascal language. I do not understand this decision to add C# in Delphi. </content>
</entry>
</feed>
