﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <description><![CDATA[Comments for The Coad Letter: Modeling and Design, Issue 113, The Latest Status of Version 2 of the UML, by Granville Miller]]></description>
    <title><![CDATA[Comments for The Coad Letter: Modeling and Design, Issue 113, The Latest Status of Version 2 of the UML, by Granville Miller]]></title>
    <link>http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/30374</link>
    <!-- source: http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/30374/feed-->
    <dc:date>2013-05-22T17:41:21-07:00</dc:date>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[Has UML 2.0 been designed to sell modeling tools or has it been designed to help domain experts, analysts, and developers communicate with each other?A flick through 2.0 revealed some good work done on making components a more coherent part of the notation but the spec has grown considerably larger and more complex.Steve Palmer (www.step-10.com)]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[ The Coad Letter: Modeling and Design, Issue 113, The Latest Status of Version 2 of the UML, by Randy Miller]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Stephen Palmer)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.embarcadero.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=35405</guid>
      <dc:date>2003-10-02T06:55:02-07:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2003-10-02T06:55:02-07:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/30374/feed">Comments for The Coad Letter: Modeling and Design, Issue 113, The Latest Status of Version 2 of the UML, by Granville Miller</source>
    </item>
    <generator>Atom 1.0 XSLT Transform v1 (http://atom.geekhood.net)</generator>
  </channel>
</rss>