<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Comments for Interview with Nick Hodges by Clay Shannon</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/plain" href="http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/30040" title="Interview with Nick Hodges by Clay Shannon" />
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/30040/feed" title="Comments for Interview with Nick Hodges by Clay Shannon" />
<id>http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/30040</id>
<updated>2009-07-06T17:01:24-07:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>Interview with Nick Hodges by Clay Shannon</title>
<author>
<name>gj o h</name>
<uri>http://threads.embarcadero.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=35123</uri>
</author>
<id>http://threads.embarcadero.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=35123</id>
<updated>2003-08-14T01:51:17-07:00</updated>
<published>2003-08-14T01:51:17-07:00</published>
<summary>Interview with Nick Hodges by Clay Shannon</summary>
<content>&lt;I am a big WebSnap advocate. &gt;   I am so.&lt;I think WebSnap is a marvelously conceived and implemented web framework. &gt;   I think WebSnap need it componet more clear and more easy to install.&lt;I say that after really struggling with it for a long time. I think it is really underappreciated, and sadly, under developed by Borland.That's not really anyone's fault -- it's sort of an &quot;Overtaken By Events&quot; situation. &gt;WebSnap is a solid foundation that never really got as fleshed out as it could be.It was really a component framework for building web applications, but people didn't see that early on, and so the component sets never were built. &gt;   I think WebSnap need it examples more in real life to learn. Yours faithfully Jesus O.(To keep going with WebSnap)I think WebSnap is very good component but a thing very important in web programingis the cotrol on the frame the web navigate and WebSnap can't it.</content>
</entry>
</feed>
