﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <description><![CDATA[Comments for How do I set the path for Turbo C++ 3.0 for DOS?]]></description>
    <title><![CDATA[Comments for How do I set the path for Turbo C++ 3.0 for DOS?]]></title>
    <link>http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/21512</link>
    <!-- source: http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/21512/feed-->
    <dc:date>2013-05-19T05:51:04-07:00</dc:date>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[Well, to be very honest, I'm wondering where this item came from...I started my programming 'hobby' with this compiler and I was very surprised that there was a question/answer (?) about this, almost ancient, piece of computer history...Don't get me wrong, I used this compiler quite often if I wanted to check some code ideas I had (and even sometimes do), that wheren't related to special OS programming, but since the release of bcb and the fact that Dos is in fact allmost a dead duck in the water, I'm quite puzzled... Not that I don't like it though...;-))From puzzled Amsterdam,Jan.]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[How do I set the path for Turbo C++ 3.0 for DOS?]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Jan Bijsterbosch)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.embarcadero.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=24811</guid>
      <dc:date>2000-04-06T15:07:15-07:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2000-04-06T15:07:15-07:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/21512/feed">Comments for How do I set the path for Turbo C++ 3.0 for DOS?</source>
    </item>
    <generator>Atom 1.0 XSLT Transform v1 (http://atom.geekhood.net)</generator>
  </channel>
</rss>